Markus Strasser

Powered by 🌱Roam Garden

"Happiness is 50% determined by genes"

flaw: terms themselves are not well defined. Stated and unstated feeling; language compressor; personal thermometer; siamese twin example; state of data capture; needs an explanatory theory of qualia

If genes code for thick butts and that makes girls happier than what if society's beauty definition changes -- all your science is out the window

Usually you get the people equivocate: "but the effect is still there", but that's just talking about correlate and not causal. It’s not an explanation

would explain something if genes can link to objective properties that people point to when they talk about happiness

If an experiment is confounded (poor experiment design), if it produces a strong signal even when its experimental hypothesis is true, then using a larger sample size will just make that signal even stronger.

Beware of Proxy Chains